Skip to content 
Edges and corners are another useful place to search. People tend to direct their gaze toward the middle of an image, especially when the central subject is visually interesting. As a result, small objects near the outer border can be overlooked several times. Slowly following the entire perimeter of both pictures can help. A missing detail, altered shape or small additional object may be placed near a corner specifically because viewers are less likely to look there first.
Shape changes can also be difficult to notice because the object itself may still be present in both images. A straight line may become curved, a handle may point in another direction, or a round object may have a slightly different outline. If viewers only ask whether an object exists in both pictures, they may miss these more subtle changes. Comparing the exact contours, orientation and proportions of individual objects can therefore be more effective than simply checking for presence or absence.
Color differences can create a similar challenge. Two shades may be close enough that the brain treats them as the same during a quick scan. A dark blue detail might become black, a green object could become slightly lighter, or a red item may appear more orange in the second picture. Small colored areas are particularly easy to overlook. When searching for color changes, it helps to compare matching objects directly rather than judging the overall color balance of the image.
Repeated objects can hide differences especially well. If a picture contains several flowers, buttons, books, leaves, windows or other similar items, viewers may register the group as a single visual pattern. Counting each item individually can reveal a missing or additional element. One image might contain five objects while the other contains four. The difference may be visible from the beginning, yet grouping can prevent the brain from noticing it. Counting forces attention to slow down and examine each repeated element separately.