Skip to content 
In the past, a major television network might interrupt regular programming when an extraordinary event occurred.
Today, almost anyone can publish an alert.
A social-media account can post a headline.
Another account can copy it.
A third can add an emotional comment.
Soon, hundreds of accounts may be repeating the same claim.
At that point, repetition can create the illusion of confirmation.
But repetition is not verification.
A rumor repeated a thousand times is still a rumor unless credible evidence supports it.
The Danger of Old Images
One common problem during breaking events is the use of old photographs.
An image from a previous security incident can suddenly be reposted alongside a new claim.
People who don’t recognize the photograph may assume it was taken moments earlier.
The same can happen with videos.
A video recorded months or years ago can be presented as evidence of something supposedly happening today.
This is why readers should be careful with visual material accompanying dramatic headlines.
A photograph can be real while the claim attached to it is completely false.
What Would Happen During a Genuine Emergency?
If a president were genuinely involved in a serious security incident, authorities would need to establish several facts quickly.
Where is the president?
Is the president safe?
What happened?
Was anyone else injured?
Has a suspect been identified?
Is there an ongoing threat?
Where is the president being taken?
Has the vice president been informed?
Are other officials safe?
These questions are part of the larger security response.
But not all of those answers would necessarily become public immediately.
During an active investigation, authorities may intentionally withhold certain information.
That can make the public uncomfortable.